Voigtlander 75mm Vs. Zeiss Contax 90mm by juan martinez

Most of us eventually want to shoot portraits, or maybe thats already all you do. Regardless, two all manual options out there for mirrorless cameras are the Voigtlander 75mm f1.8 M-mount and the Carl Zeiss Contax 90mm f2.8, designed and made for the luxurious Contax G1 and G2 film cameras from the '90's. The Voigtlander you can mount on any mirrorless body using a simple $12 adapter. The Contax requires a more advanced adapter, one that incorporates a focus ring in order to allow you o manually focus the lens when not mounted on a Contax G1 (or G2) film body. These go for $40-$130 depending on quality. Used the Voigtlander lens can be found for $400-$450 range with the Contax lens being sold for $180-$250 without an adapter. You figure another $80 for a nice adapter and the Contax is a $250-$330 lens package. Not bad. 

Below you will find the Voigtlander test shots on the left with the Contax shots on the right. The below series are taken with a Sony A7S with WB, ISO set the same for both lenses and focused on the target (obv).

Voigtlander 75 closer to target to emulate 90mm framing. Set at f2.8 (stopped-down).

Contax 90 at f2.8 (wide-open)


Here you can see the difference a 75mm will give you versus 90mm at the same distance from the target.

Voigtlander 75 at f2.8

Contax 90 at f2.8 (wide-open)

Voigtlander 75 at f4

Contax 90 at f4


The next are both wide-open, the Voigtlander at f1.8 and the Contax at f2.8


I then compared the lenses mounted on a Fujifilm Xpro2.

Voigtlander 75mm f2.8 framed like a 90mm

Contax 90 at f2.8


What was quickly noticed was the sharpness of the wide-open Contax 90 beat-out the stopped-down performance from the Voigtlander. The bokeh was more pleasant and the highlight bokeh balls kept a round shape even when stopped down on the Contax to f4, while the Voigtlander could not retain the round shape. Conclusion; the Carl Zeiss Contax 90mm G is a better lens and value than the poor performing Voigtlander 75mm f1.8 M-Mount. 

Fujifilm Xf16-55 f2.8 LM WR versus Fuji primes by juan martinez

The Fujifilm xf16-55 f2.8 LM WR zoom lens is meant to be a professional alternative to carrying a bag full of primes. Indeed,  the build, fast AF motors, constant f2.8 aperture through-out the range (16mm-55mm) and weather resistant WR designation all help qualify it as a fantastic pro-level lens. But does it have the IQ to compete with the excellent Fujifilm primes? Could it work to replace these primes in your camera bag? Lets take a look... 

The XF1655 was compared against the following primes: xf16, xf23, xf35, xf56 all at f2.8 except where noted. The xf1655 on the left with the various primes on the right.

xf1655 at 16mm f2.8

xf1655 at 22mm f2.8

xf1655 at 34mm f2.8

xf1655 at 55mm f2.8

xf16 at 16mm f2.8

xf23 at 23mm f2.8

xf35 at 35mm f2.8

xf56 at 56mm f2.8

At first glance the biggest difference to me is the bokeh. The xf1655 creates slightly busier bokeh, with bokeh balls that aren't as solid as the primes. The highlights clearly have "onion ring" silhouettes within then. But overall, when considering the image as a whole, I would say you get 90-95% of the excellent Fujifilm prime lens IQ all rolled into one big-ass lens. Furthermore, if you consider the fact that the xf1655 is competing wide-open while the others are stopped down where all lenses improve (sharper), it did fantastic! Colors seem a tad warmer as well. Additionally, its close focus ability helps make the best of the f2.8 max aperture which works great for food and beer-porn photography!

Below are two shots on the xf1655 and xf56 at f4. One can easily notice the xf1655 keeps its round bokeh ball shape where the excellent xf56 gets very hexagonal (actually in the above crops at f2.8 you can notice the less ideal hexagonal bokeh highlights as well!).

xf1655 at 55mm f4 top right crop. Bokeh balls are still round stopped-down.

xf1655 at 55mm f4 top right crop. Bokeh balls are still round stopped-down.

xf56 at 56mm f4. Top right crop. Notice the hexagonal highlights/bokeh balls.

And just for fun, the xf56 at wide-open f1.2. Definitely a beautiful lens and the better portrait only lens.

xf56 at f1.2...lovely creamy bokeh!

Could the xf1655 serve as the perfect all in one lens? If shot carefully I really think so. You won't be able to get the super shallow DOF or super creamy bokeh like you can with the primes (except the xf27 f2.8 that is) but bokeh isn't everything. Composition and subject matter truly are more important.  If you can agree, then the all in one xf1655 lens solution may be the right lens for you.

Leica Noctilux Vs. Voigtlander Nokton Vs. Carl Zeiss C-Sonnar by juan martinez

A few months ago I had a fun opportunity to compare the Leica Noctilux 50mm f1 versus the Voigtander Nokton 50mm f1.1 versus the venerable Carl Zeiss C-Sonnar 50mm f1.5 ZM. All lenses were compared wide-open at their largest apertures. Here is what we found.

Sharpest: The C-Sonnar is the sharpest lens wide-open, followed by the Nokton and lastly the Noctilux. 

Bokeh: The smoothest bokeh crown is owned by the Noctilux, followed by the C-Sonnar and the Nokton. Though the C-Sonnar is slower, the bokeh more closely matches the Noctilux's character, just with a few stops more depth of field (DOF).

Overall image/look: The Zeiss "Pop" is alive and well on the C-Sonnar. Turning-in the best transition from in-focus and sharp subject ( in this case a pint glass) to out of focus areas and creamy bokeh. The Nokton does a commendable job with both sharpness and shallow depth of field bokeh, but with slightly busier bokeh than that out of the Noctilux; its closest competitor. The Noctilux, well thats a look completely unique and a class all its own. The bokeh is creamiest, it has the least "Pop" and is also the softest wide-open with a classic glow that most people love.  

Overall, the winner in my eyes and best value for money, if you are biased-towards attaining shallowest DOF, would be the Voigtander Nokton 50mm f1.1. It isn't the sharpest wide-open, but still sharp and considering it has 1.1, 1.5, 1.8 aperture stops, the easiest to sharpen-up without gaining too much DOF. Furthermore, stopped-down to F1.5 (like the C-Sonnar) it could no doubt get close to/match the C-Sonnar's performance wide-open. However, for portraits, daylight shooting or film photography, my choice would be the C-Sonnar no doubt.

In the used market the Nokton's sell from $650-$750 ( I got mine for $460 however). The C-Sonnar is $800-$850 and the Leica Noctilux f1, well they go for $5,000 used. The newer and faster Noctilux f.95 sells for $6,800-$7,000 used and perhaps would provide the sharpness of the C-Sonnar or Nokton, with undoubtely creamiest bokeh of all. 

If price is a factor, the Voigtlander or Carl Zeiss Sonnar are both excellent choices for a fast 50mm lens that are built well, provide an image full of character and all for a fraction of the price for the Leica Noctilux. Are there other cheaper, excellent 50mm lenses out there? Yep! And we will follow-up with a wider ranging comparison here soon. 

Contributor Pocholo Francisco had these thoughts...

I agree with your technical assessments of the lenses but I have to disagree with your final conclusion in that I actually think the best value is the Zeiss 50mm C-Sonnar. Mainly because it definitely has character and is compact for everyday use and is also a pretty fast lens for night shooting. If, however, you're in the market for a low light lens for use with a film rangefinder then the Nokton is a good value for that. I just don't believe you need that fast of a lens for low light, especially with the low light abilities of the modern sensors. The Noctilux and Zeiss run away with the most character and for me the Noctilux definitely has the smoothest bokeh of the bunch.

Test samples available here and below. All shot wide-open tested on a first-gen Sony A7S.

Carl Zeiss C-Sonnar 50mm f1.5 ZM. Image "Pop" King!

Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f1.1 M-mount

Leica Noctilux 50mm f1 (look at that glow from the stem of the pint glass)

//30 Minutes with the Fujifilm XT-2!\\ by juan martinez

Chris Cochran (@cochranphotos) invited Juan Martinez (@juanny6pac) to Nelson's Photo Supplies in San Diego, Ca. for a special hands-on experience with the Fujifilm XT-2. Chris' excellent blog post can be read here

As a current Fujifilm XPro-2 owner I was interested in what autofocus improvements have been made. There's no question it is there, but it wasn't really obvious in single shot mode or during our well lit conditions. Furthermore the XT-2 felt just like the original XT-1. Which is to say, smallish, well built and with an EVF that forced my nose to bury into the screen. The dial lock buttons were a nice feature, as was the tilt / flip-out screen. I do admit, that swivel screen is something I wish the XPro-2 offered. More than anything I came away yearning for 4K and F-Log... even if you can't record 4K F-Log in body just yet. And very excited for October's XPro-2 firmware update giving current owners the improved AF performance the new XT-2 will receive.

We did get confirmation the XT-2 will shoot 4K with the original series batteries, and will do up to 29 minutes of max record time (temperature dependent). The optional battery grip made handling the XT-2 with the XF1655 LM WR lens we had on hand, superior than the same lens on the XPro-2. And the 14fps sounds marvelous in person! 

Pros:

  • 4K Video
  • Improved AutoFocus
  • Optional Grip (3 batteries and over 1,000 shots!)
  • Nice build
  • EVF is marvelous as ever with a faster frame rate than the XPro-2's current firmware provides
  • $100 Cheaper than the XPro2

Cons:

  • Feels and looks a LOT like the original XT-1, which means fairly small for bigger hands
  • LCD resolution isn't as good as the one on the XPro2 but it does swivel and flip
  • Doesn't record in body F-Log in 4K video
  • Requires optional grip for 4K video recording times longer than 10 minutes

We shot some quick clips during the short hands-on, and the video can be seen here and below. Incidentally this was shot on the XPro-2, and it looks quite alright. Enjoy and comment below!   

 

Left: XPro-2 Right: XT-2 with optional battery grip

Left: XPro-2 Right: XT-2 with optional battery grip

Both are wonderful for different reasons, but the XT-2 is a better package

Both are wonderful for different reasons, but the XT-2 is a better package

Chris Cochran falling in love

Chris Cochran falling in love

Me getting some touchy-feely hands-on with the XT-2

Me getting some touchy-feely hands-on with the XT-2

What's in Raquel Martinez / @rleannemartinez's bag by juan martinez

Name: Raquel Martinez, San Diego, CA.  Pictures by: Juan Martinez, XPro-2 with Xf165

B&C: What's your go to camera set-up as a daily carry? And your bag?

RM: I bring my Fujifilm X70 and Nikon F3 everywhere I go. My Zkin Obia is currently my go to bag.

B&C: What do you find most appealing about that camera?

RM: The X70 may be small but it is one awesome little camera! Plus that Fuji color is my fav. 

B&C: And you shoot film as well?

RM: Yes! You don't see me pull out my F3 as often but I just love getting rolls back after I've been carrying it around for a while. Never know what jems you are going to find.

B&C: How about for more serious photography?

RM: I don't get too serious with my photography but when I do...I prefer a Sony full frame.

 

ZKIN Obia bag

Extra battery and film

Fujifilm X70

Nikon F3